Databases

MongoDB vs PostgreSQL

MongoDB has 4 supported release lines and PostgreSQL has 5. PostgreSQL 14 reaches end of life on Nov 12, 2026, and MongoDB 8.2 reached end of life on Jul 31, 2026. MongoDB is source-available under SSPL-1.0; PostgreSQL is open source (PostgreSQL License).

Last checked against endoflife.date and deps.dev.

Side by side

Every value links to its source. Where a row doesn’t apply to one of them, the cell says why.

Support and releases
MongoDBPostgreSQL
Supported release lines

4 lines: 9.0, 8.3, 8.0, 7.0

Next to end: 7.0 on Aug 31, 2027

endoflife.date

5 lines: 18, 17, 16, 15, 14

Next to end: 14 on Nov 12, 2026

endoflife.date

Latest release

9.0.4

Released Oct 14, 2026

endoflife.date

18.6

Released Aug 11, 2026

endoflife.date

Releases in the last 12 months

2 new release lines

Patch releases aren’t counted

endoflife.date

No new release lines

Patch releases aren’t counted

endoflife.date

Security
MongoDBPostgreSQL
Advisories published in the last 12 months

Not tracked as a package on OSV.dev

Not tracked as a package on OSV.dev

Security advisories

OpenSSF Scorecard

4.7 / 10

mongodb/mongo, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

6.1 / 10

postgres/postgres, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

Licence and hosting
MongoDBPostgreSQL
Licence

SSPL-1.0

Source-available, not open source

Using MongoDB as your app’s database is fine; offering MongoDB itself as a service would require releasing your whole service stack under the SSPL.

mongodb.com

PostgreSQL License

Open source (permissive)

postgresql.org

How you run it

Self-host Community Server, or MongoDB Atlas, the vendor’s managed service

Self-hosted, or managed by most clouds (Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Azure) and platforms such as Supabase and Neon

Adoption
MongoDBPostgreSQL
GitHub stars

28.6K

mongodb/mongo

GitHub

22.4K

postgres/postgres

GitHub

Which fits your constraints

Read across for what matters to you. Each answer comes from the data above or the project’s licence and hosting options.

How MongoDB and PostgreSQL fit common constraints
MongoDBPostgreSQL
An open-source licence

No: Source-available (SSPL-1.0)

Yes: PostgreSQL License

Someone else runs it for you

Yes: From MongoDB Atlas

Yes: From Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Azure, Supabase, Neon

You can run it on your own servers

Yes: Yes, it’s software you install

Yes: Yes, it’s software you install

A long support window

9.0 is supported until Oct 31, 2031

18 is supported until Nov 14, 2030

What each is good at

MongoDB

Document-oriented NoSQL database with flexible schema

Strengths

  • Flexible schema for evolving data models
  • Rich query language with aggregation
  • Horizontal scaling with sharding
  • Strong developer experience with drivers

Trade-offs

  • Higher memory usage
  • Data duplication for relationships

Common uses

  • Content management
  • Real-time analytics
  • IoT data
  • Mobile apps

PostgreSQL

Advanced open-source relational database with rich features

Strengths

  • ACID compliant with strong data integrity
  • Advanced features (JSON, full-text search, GIS)
  • Extensible with custom functions and types
  • Excellent performance for complex queries
  • Strong community and ecosystem

Trade-offs

  • Steeper learning curve than MySQL
  • Slightly slower for simple read-heavy workloads
  • More memory intensive

Common uses

  • Transactional applications
  • Data warehousing
  • GIS applications
  • JSON document storage

From StackPrism’s curated notes. Pricing isn’t covered here: it changes often, so check each vendor’s pricing page.

When teams weigh these two

This is the document-versus-relational decision. MongoDB stores JSON-like documents with a flexible schema; PostgreSQL stores rows in tables with SQL and joins, and its JSONB type covers many document use cases. The licences differ too: PostgreSQL uses the permissive PostgreSQL License, while MongoDB Community Server is under the SSPL.

How this comparison works

Release lines and end-of-life dates come from endoflife.date, release counts from deps.dev’s publish dates, and advisories from OSV.dev, counted once per flaw even when it’s listed under several ids, and checked against CISA’s list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. Status and incident history come from each vendor’s public status feed; licences from each project’s licence file or the vendor’s licensing page, linked in the table.

The data refreshes every few hours and the time it was checked is shown above. There’s no pricing and no overall winner: which one fits depends on your constraints. To see how the versions you actually run hold up, check your repo.

Already using one of them?

Paste a public GitHub repo and see what’s vulnerable, end of life or deprecated in it today. Free, no sign-up.