Databases

Apache Cassandra vs MongoDB

Apache Cassandra has 3 supported release lines and MongoDB has 4. MongoDB 8.2 reached end of life on Jul 31, 2026. Apache Cassandra is open source (Apache-2.0); MongoDB is source-available under SSPL-1.0.

Last checked against endoflife.date, deps.dev, OSV.dev and CISA KEV.

Side by side

Every value links to its source. Where a row doesn’t apply to one of them, the cell says why.

Support and releases
Apache CassandraMongoDB
Supported release lines

3 lines: 5.0, 4.1, 4.0

No end dates published

endoflife.date

4 lines: 9.0, 8.3, 8.0, 7.0

Next to end: 7.0 on Aug 31, 2027

endoflife.date

Latest release

5.0.9

Released Aug 7, 2026

endoflife.date

9.0.4

Released Oct 14, 2026

endoflife.date

Releases in the last 12 months

8 releases

cassandra-all, server artifact

Maven Central

2 new release lines

Patch releases aren’t counted

endoflife.date

Security
Apache CassandraMongoDB
Advisories published in the last 12 months

3, worst rated high

For cassandra-all

OSV.dev

Not tracked as a package on OSV.dev

OpenSSF Scorecard

4.8 / 10

apache/cassandra, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

4.7 / 10

mongodb/mongo, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

Licence and hosting
Apache CassandraMongoDB
Licence

Apache-2.0

Open source (permissive)

deps.dev

SSPL-1.0

Source-available, not open source

Using MongoDB as your app’s database is fine; offering MongoDB itself as a service would require releasing your whole service stack under the SSPL.

mongodb.com

How you run it

Self-hosted, or Cassandra-compatible managed services such as Amazon Keyspaces and DataStax Astra DB

Self-host Community Server, or MongoDB Atlas, the vendor’s managed service

Adoption
Apache CassandraMongoDB
GitHub stars

10.1K

apache/cassandra

GitHub

28.6K

mongodb/mongo

GitHub

  • Advisory counts cover every version, old ones included, and a heavily used, well-audited project often has more. Check the versions you run with the dependency check.

Which fits your constraints

Read across for what matters to you. Each answer comes from the data above or the project’s licence and hosting options.

How Apache Cassandra and MongoDB fit common constraints
Apache CassandraMongoDB
An open-source licence

Yes: Apache-2.0

No: Source-available (SSPL-1.0)

Someone else runs it for you

Yes: From Amazon Keyspaces and DataStax Astra DB (Cassandra-compatible)

Yes: From MongoDB Atlas

You can run it on your own servers

Yes: Yes, it’s software you install

Yes: Yes, it’s software you install

A long support window

No end dates published

9.0 is supported until Oct 31, 2031

What each is good at

Apache Cassandra

Distributed wide-column NoSQL database for high scalability

Strengths

  • Linear scalability across nodes
  • No single point of failure
  • Handles massive write throughput
  • Multi-datacenter replication

Trade-offs

  • Complex to operate and tune
  • Eventual consistency trade-offs
  • Higher operational overhead

Common uses

  • Time-series data
  • IoT sensor data
  • Real-time analytics
  • High-write workloads

MongoDB

Document-oriented NoSQL database with flexible schema

Strengths

  • Flexible schema for evolving data models
  • Rich query language with aggregation
  • Horizontal scaling with sharding
  • Strong developer experience with drivers

Trade-offs

  • Higher memory usage
  • Data duplication for relationships

Common uses

  • Content management
  • Real-time analytics
  • IoT data
  • Mobile apps

From StackPrism’s curated notes. Pricing isn’t covered here: it changes often, so check each vendor’s pricing page.

When teams weigh these two

Both are NoSQL databases that scale out across many nodes, but they model data differently. Cassandra is a wide-column store designed around high write volumes and multi-datacenter replication; MongoDB stores JSON-like documents and supports flexible ad-hoc queries.

How this comparison works

Release lines and end-of-life dates come from endoflife.date, release counts from deps.dev’s publish dates, and advisories from OSV.dev, counted once per flaw even when it’s listed under several ids, and checked against CISA’s list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. Status and incident history come from each vendor’s public status feed; licences from each project’s licence file or the vendor’s licensing page, linked in the table.

The data refreshes every few hours and the time it was checked is shown above. There’s no pricing and no overall winner: which one fits depends on your constraints. To see how the versions you actually run hold up, check your repo.

Already using one of them?

Paste a public GitHub repo and see what’s vulnerable, end of life or deprecated in it today. Free, no sign-up.