Backend platforms

Supabase vs Firebase

Both are offered as hosted services, so the useful comparison is each vendor’s track record, SDK and licence rather than version support. Supabase is open source (Apache-2.0); Firebase is a proprietary service. In the last 90 days Supabase’s status feed logged 16 or more incidents and Firebase’s 5.

Last checked against Supabase Status, npm, deps.dev, OSV.dev, Firebase Status and Google Cloud Status.

Side by side

Every value links to its source. Where a row doesn’t apply to one of them, the cell says why.

Support and releases
SupabaseFirebase
Latest release

2.118.0

JavaScript SDK @supabase/supabase-js, Oct 15, 2026

npm

13.0.0

JavaScript SDK firebase, Oct 7, 2026

npm

Releases in the last 12 months

95 releases

JavaScript SDK @supabase/supabase-js

npm

18 releases

JavaScript SDK firebase

npm

Security
SupabaseFirebase
Advisories published in the last 12 months

None

For @supabase/supabase-js

OSV.dev

None

For firebase

OSV.dev

OpenSSF Scorecard

7.3 / 10

supabase/supabase-js, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

7.5 / 10

firebase/firebase-js-sdk, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

Status and incidents
SupabaseFirebase
Status now

Operational

Status page

Operational

Status page

Incidents in the last 90 days

16+, 6 major

The feed only goes back to Aug 28, 2026

History

5

Most recent: Firebase Hosting projects presenting intermittent "Bandwidth Quota… (Oct 7, 2026)

History

Licence and hosting
SupabaseFirebase
Licence

Apache-2.0

Open source (permissive)

SDK (@supabase/supabase-js): MIT.

deps.dev

Proprietary service

Not open source

SDK (firebase): Apache-2.0.

How you run it

Supabase’s managed platform, or self-host the open-source stack

Managed by Google

Adoption
SupabaseFirebase
npm downloads last week

31.1M

@supabase/supabase-js

npm

10.7M

firebase

npm

GitHub stars

111K

supabase/supabase

GitHub

Hosted service: no public repository

  • Advisory counts cover every version, old ones included, and a heavily used, well-audited project often has more. Check the versions you run with the dependency check.
  • Incident history is context, not a ranking: every vendor has incidents, and vendors post them at different thresholds.

Which fits your constraints

Read across for what matters to you. Each answer comes from the data above or the project’s licence and hosting options.

How Supabase and Firebase fit common constraints
SupabaseFirebase
An open-source licence

Yes: Apache-2.0

No: Proprietary service

Someone else runs it for you

Yes: From Supabase

Yes: From Google

You can run it on your own servers

Yes: Self-hosting is documented

No: Hosted only

A public incident history

Yes: Status page with 90-day history

Yes: Status page with 90-day history

What each is good at

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative

Strengths

  • PostgreSQL-based
  • Open-source
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • SQL queries

Trade-offs

  • Younger project
  • Fewer integrations
  • Self-hosting complexity

Common uses

  • Real-time apps
  • Firebase migrations
  • PostgreSQL + real-time
  • Open-source preference

Firebase

Real-time NoSQL cloud database

Strengths

  • Real-time synchronization
  • Offline support
  • Easy to use
  • Mobile SDKs

Trade-offs

  • Google vendor lock-in
  • Limited querying
  • Scaling challenges

Common uses

  • Mobile apps
  • Real-time chat
  • Collaboration tools
  • Live dashboards

From StackPrism’s curated notes. Pricing isn’t covered here: it changes often, so check each vendor’s pricing page.

When teams weigh these two

Both give a small team a hosted database, sign-in, file storage and serverless functions behind one client SDK, which is why they’re so often weighed against each other for a new app’s backend. The usual deciding question is the data model: Supabase is built on PostgreSQL, so you query with SQL, while Firebase’s core databases, Cloud Firestore and the Realtime Database, are NoSQL stores.

How this comparison works

Release lines and end-of-life dates come from endoflife.date, release counts from deps.dev’s publish dates, and advisories from OSV.dev, counted once per flaw even when it’s listed under several ids, and checked against CISA’s list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. Status and incident history come from each vendor’s public status feed; licences from each project’s licence file or the vendor’s licensing page, linked in the table.

The data refreshes every few hours and the time it was checked is shown above. There’s no pricing and no overall winner: which one fits depends on your constraints. To see how the versions you actually run hold up, check your repo.

Already using one of them?

Paste a public GitHub repo and see what’s vulnerable, end of life or deprecated in it today. Free, no sign-up.