Search

Meilisearch vs Elasticsearch

Meilisearch has one supported release line and Elasticsearch has 3. Meilisearch 1.53 reached end of life on Sep 21, 2026, and Elasticsearch 9.3 reached it on Aug 4, 2026. Meilisearch is open source (MIT); Elasticsearch offers SSPL-1.0, Elastic-2.0 or AGPL-3.0.

Last checked against endoflife.date, deps.dev and OSV.dev.

Side by side

Every value links to its source. Where a row doesn’t apply to one of them, the cell says why.

Support and releases
MeilisearchElasticsearch
Supported release lines

Only the newest, 1.54

1.53 ended Sep 21, 2026

endoflife.date

3 lines: 9.5, 9.4, 8.19

Next to end: 8.19 on Jul 15, 2027

endoflife.date

Latest release

1.54.3

Released Oct 1, 2026

endoflife.date

9.5.5

Released Oct 6, 2026

endoflife.date

Releases in the last 12 months

31 new release lines

Patch releases aren’t counted

endoflife.date

56 releases

elasticsearch, server artifact

Maven Central

Security
MeilisearchElasticsearch
Advisories published in the last 12 months

Not tracked as a package on OSV.dev

Security advisories

None

For elasticsearch

OSV.dev

OpenSSF Scorecard

7.2 / 10

meilisearch/meilisearch, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

6.7 / 10

elastic/elasticsearch, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

Licence and hosting
MeilisearchElasticsearch
Licence

MIT

Open source (permissive)

That’s the Community Edition; Enterprise Edition features, such as sharding and replication, are under BUSL-1.1.

github.com/meilisearch

SSPL-1.0, Elastic-2.0 or AGPL-3.0

Open source under the AGPL-3.0 option

Elastic left Apache 2.0 in 2021; the default distribution is under the Elastic License 2.0, which forbids offering Elasticsearch as a managed service. AGPLv3 was added as a source-code option in 2024.

elastic.co

How you run it

Self-hosted, or Meilisearch Cloud, the vendor’s managed service

Self-hosted, or Elastic Cloud, the vendor’s managed service

Adoption
MeilisearchElasticsearch
GitHub stars

59.6K

meilisearch/meilisearch

GitHub

78.3K

elastic/elasticsearch

GitHub

  • Advisory counts cover every version, old ones included, and a heavily used, well-audited project often has more. Check the versions you run with the dependency check.

Which fits your constraints

Read across for what matters to you. Each answer comes from the data above or the project’s licence and hosting options.

How Meilisearch and Elasticsearch fit common constraints
MeilisearchElasticsearch
An open-source licence

Yes: MIT

Yes: Under the AGPL-3.0 option

Someone else runs it for you

Yes: From Meilisearch Cloud

Yes: From Elastic Cloud

You can run it on your own servers

Yes: Yes, it’s software you install

Yes: Yes, it’s software you install

A long support window

Only the newest line (1.54); no end dates published

8.19 is supported until Jul 15, 2027

What each is good at

Meilisearch

Lightning-fast open-source search engine

Strengths

  • Sub-millisecond search responses
  • Out-of-the-box typo tolerance
  • Easy setup with good defaults
  • Beautiful search-as-you-type experience
  • Lightweight and developer-friendly

Trade-offs

  • Less feature-rich than Elasticsearch
  • Smaller community
  • Limited advanced analytics

Common uses

  • Instant search
  • Documentation sites
  • E-commerce search
  • Content discovery

Elasticsearch

Distributed search and analytics engine

Strengths

  • Powerful full-text search
  • Real-time indexing
  • Rich aggregation capabilities
  • Scalable distributed architecture

Trade-offs

  • High memory usage
  • Complex to tune and optimize
  • Eventual consistency

Common uses

  • Log analytics
  • Full-text search
  • Application monitoring
  • Business analytics

From StackPrism’s curated notes. Pricing isn’t covered here: it changes often, so check each vendor’s pricing page.

When teams weigh these two

Meilisearch is built for instant, typo-tolerant search in websites and apps, with sensible defaults out of the box; Elasticsearch is a general search and analytics engine that also powers log analytics. Teams usually weigh how much tuning they want to do against how much the engine can do.

How this comparison works

Release lines and end-of-life dates come from endoflife.date, release counts from deps.dev’s publish dates, and advisories from OSV.dev, counted once per flaw even when it’s listed under several ids, and checked against CISA’s list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. Status and incident history come from each vendor’s public status feed; licences from each project’s licence file or the vendor’s licensing page, linked in the table.

The data refreshes every few hours and the time it was checked is shown above. There’s no pricing and no overall winner: which one fits depends on your constraints. To see how the versions you actually run hold up, check your repo.

Already using one of them?

Paste a public GitHub repo and see what’s vulnerable, end of life or deprecated in it today. Free, no sign-up.