Monitoring and observability

Datadog vs Sentry

Both are offered as hosted services, so the useful comparison is each vendor’s track record, SDK and licence rather than version support. Datadog is a proprietary service; Sentry is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. In the last 90 days Datadog’s status feed logged 11 incidents and Sentry’s 22.

Last checked against Datadog Status, deps.dev, npm, OSV.dev, CISA KEV and Sentry Status.

Side by side

Every value links to its source. Where a row doesn’t apply to one of them, the cell says why.

Support and releases
DatadogSentry
Latest release

6.21.0

Node.js tracer dd-trace, Oct 14, 2026

npm

11.8.0

Node.js SDK @sentry/node, Oct 15, 2026

npm

Releases in the last 12 months

85 releases

Node.js tracer dd-trace

npm

77 releases

Node.js SDK @sentry/node

npm

Security
DatadogSentry
Advisories published in the last 12 months

1, worst rated high

For dd-trace

OSV.dev

1, worst rated moderate

For @sentry/node

OSV.dev

OpenSSF Scorecard

6 / 10

DataDog/dd-trace-js, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

5.8 / 10

getsentry/sentry-javascript, Aug 24, 2026

Scorecard

Status and incidents
DatadogSentry
Status now

Operational

Status page

Operational

Status page

Incidents in the last 90 days

11, 1 major

Most recent: Delayed Events (Sep 30, 2026)

History

22, 14 major

Most recent: Ingestion Halted for EAP data in EU (Oct 14, 2026)

History

Licence and hosting
DatadogSentry
Licence

Proprietary service

Not open source

SDK (dd-trace): Apache-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause.

FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0

Source-available, not open source

Fair Source: each release becomes Apache 2.0 after two years. Sentry’s SDKs are MIT. SDK (@sentry/node): MIT.

open.sentry.io

How you run it

Managed by Datadog; you run its agent and tracers

Sentry’s managed service, or self-host it

Adoption
DatadogSentry
npm downloads last week

10.2M

dd-trace

npm

40M

@sentry/node

npm

GitHub stars

Hosted service: no public repository

45.5K

getsentry/sentry

GitHub

  • Advisory counts cover every version, old ones included, and a heavily used, well-audited project often has more. Check the versions you run with the dependency check.
  • Incident history is context, not a ranking: every vendor has incidents, and vendors post them at different thresholds.

Which fits your constraints

Read across for what matters to you. Each answer comes from the data above or the project’s licence and hosting options.

How Datadog and Sentry fit common constraints
DatadogSentry
An open-source licence

No: Proprietary service

No: Source-available (FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0)

Someone else runs it for you

Yes: From Datadog

Yes: From Sentry

You can run it on your own servers

No: Hosted only

Yes: Self-hosting is documented

A public incident history

Yes: Status page with 90-day history

Yes: Status page with 90-day history

What each is good at

Datadog

Comprehensive monitoring and analytics platform

Strengths

  • All-in-one platform (metrics, logs, traces)
  • Beautiful dashboards
  • Extensive integrations (400+)
  • Powerful alerting and anomaly detection

Trade-offs

  • Vendor lock-in
  • Requires agent installation

Common uses

  • Full-stack monitoring
  • APM
  • Log management
  • Security monitoring

Sentry

Application error monitoring and performance tracking SaaS

Strengths

  • Excellent error tracking and grouping
  • Rich source-map and release support
  • Strong SDK ecosystem
  • Performance and tracing built-in

Trade-offs

  • Vendor lock-in for hosted plans
  • Self-hosted variant is complex to operate

Common uses

  • Frontend error tracking
  • Backend exception monitoring
  • Release health monitoring

From StackPrism’s curated notes. Pricing isn’t covered here: it changes often, so check each vendor’s pricing page.

When teams weigh these two

These overlap less than the search suggests: Sentry started as error tracking and adds performance tracing and session replay, while Datadog is a full observability platform for metrics, logs, APM and security. The comparison matters when you want one tool for errors and traces.

How this comparison works

Release lines and end-of-life dates come from endoflife.date, release counts from deps.dev’s publish dates, and advisories from OSV.dev, counted once per flaw even when it’s listed under several ids, and checked against CISA’s list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited. Status and incident history come from each vendor’s public status feed; licences from each project’s licence file or the vendor’s licensing page, linked in the table.

The data refreshes every few hours and the time it was checked is shown above. There’s no pricing and no overall winner: which one fits depends on your constraints. To see how the versions you actually run hold up, check your repo.

Already using one of them?

Paste a public GitHub repo and see what’s vulnerable, end of life or deprecated in it today. Free, no sign-up.